The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

Wikipedia halts its AI summary rollout after human editors raise concerns about credibility. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries ...

Wikipedia in the age of AI. As AI becomes ubiquitous, it could pose threats to Wikipedia's sustainability. If people turn to AI chatbots to get their information rather than visiting Wikipedia ...

Following a slew of complaints from editors, a Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson confirmed to 404 Media that it’s pausing the two-week test, which began on June 2nd. The experiment put AI-generated ...

A ccording to the study, OpenAI’s artificial intelligence software has already surpassed Wikipedia in the number of online searches. The AI recorded a 36% increase in users between the first ...

A day later, after many, many editors continued to respond negatively to the idea, Wikimedia backed down and canceled its plans to add AI-generated summaries. Editors are the lifeblood of the platform ...

According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select articles in ...

Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia's credibility.

Wikipedia already uses AI to detect vandalism, translate content and predict readability, but up until the announcement, it had not offered AI services to its editors.

In 2014, Stephen Hawking voiced grave warnings about the threats of artificial intelligence. His concerns were not based on any anticipated evil intent, though. Instead, it was from the idea of AI ...

Wikipedia has created a machine-readable version of its corpus specifically tailored for AI training. Nikolas Kokovlis/NurPhoto/Getty On Wednesday, the Wikimedia Foundation announced it is ...